The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 2017 report is one of the big government resources courts and lawyers cite when it comes to marijuana and driving impairment.
NHTSA 2017 REPORT: MARIJUANA IMPARIED DRIVING - A REPORT TO CONGRESS
Key Findings:
Detection vs. Impairment
- The presence of THC in blood or metabolites in urine does not reliably indicate impairment.
- Unlike alcohol (where BAC correlates well with impairment), there is no clear threshold of THC that can predict driving impairment.
Pharmacology of THC
- Delta-9-THC (active compound): Impairing effects are short-lived (usually within a few hours).
- 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THC-COOH): This is non-psychoactive and can stay in the body for days or weeks after use — but has no correlation to impairment.
Performance Effects
- Some studies show marijuana can impair attention, tracking, reaction time, and coordination.
- However, the degree of impairment varies widely between individuals.
- Experienced users may show less measurable impairment, while inexperienced users show more.
No Per Se Limit
- Unlike the 0.08% BAC limit for alcohol, NHTSA concluded that a per se THC limit is not scientifically supportable.
- Different people with the same THC blood level may be unimpaired or significantly impaired.
QUOTE FROM NHTSA REPORT, PAGE 13 AND 14
"Thus, there are currently no evidence-based methods to detect marijuana-impaired driving. Marijuana has some regularly reported effects on driving related skills that might lend themselves to the development of marijuana-impaired driving detection techniques, similar to those that have been developed for alcohol-impaired driving (Harris, 1980 and Stuster, 1997). However, many of these effects can also be caused by alcohol, other drugs and driver conditions and activities like distraction, drowsiness, and illness. It is not possible to predict whether there might be a unique combination of cues that could be used by law enforcement to detect marijuana-impaired driving with a high degree of
accuracy. Such a method would need to have an extremely low false positive rate (incorrectly identifying a driver as marijuana-impaired when they are not) to be useable by law enforcement.
Feasibility of Developing an Impairment Standard for Drivers under the Influence of Marijuana
Currently, there is no impairment standard for drivers under the influence of marijuana. Many of the reasons for this are discussed elsewhere in this report. They include the fact that there is no chemical test for marijuana impairment, like a BAC or BrAC test for alcohol that quantifies the amount of alcohol in their body, indicates the degree of impairment, and the risk of crash involvement that results from the use of alcohol. The psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinal (THC), does not blood or oral fluid within a short enough time for high THC levels to be detected. As was mentioned
peak THC levels have declined 80% - 90%.
Devices Capable of Measuring Marijuana Levels in Drivers
Conviction on a Driving Under the Influence of Drugs (DUID) charge, or evidence that marijuana played a role in a crash, typically requires evidence that the driver was impaired by marijuana at the time of arrest or the crash. While alcohol concentration (BAC or BrAC) is an accurate measurement of alcohol impairment of driving, the presence of THC in the driver’s body has not been shown to be a reliable measure of marijuana impairment of driving.
Traditionally, measurement of marijuana use by drivers has involved testing biological specimens for the presence of THC (typically blood samples, though urine and other substance have been used). As was stated previously, this testing can take days, weeks, or months before the results are available to law enforcement. The tests take a few hours or less to conduct, but large backlogs in many State laboratories conducting the testing can result in long delays before results are available. Such tests not only indicate whether THC was present in the sample tested, they also quantify the concentration or amount of THC
detected. These toxicological tests confirm presence of THC but they do not indicate driver impairment or necessarily indicate recent marijuana use (when the THC levels are low)."